Ahahahah true!!!

for the same reason I chose the dwarf!

But the dwarf isn't bad, he's a nice class to play, fun and very rewarding.

It depends on the game you want to play.


But a small description of the class I would put, a short presentation, as it should be, and skills

Good idea.

Nice idea, and graphically exceptional. Even the eye wants its part.


Instead I created an .xls file with a tree diagram, where at each step you choose between 2 or 3. (I never finished it)

I like the idea of ​​following your choices in the character information tab. I really like

compbatant wrote: ↑

Sat Jul 18, 2020 1:08 pm

Price changed to 20$ which is cost of 2x premium skin

For people who paid more for unique skin colors I will offer adding extra levels. Please contact me.

quite right. I share. thank you.

Barkley wrote: ↑

Sat Jul 18, 2020 10:55 am

Syor wrote: ↑

Sat Jul 18, 2020 10:02 am

New skin yeeee
Pharaon Freya

Jungle Amazon

You willing to pay 75$ for each of those?

Absolutely not. I think the price of two premiums is right. Not more.

New skin yeeee
Pharaon Freya

Jungle Amazon

Sklep your skill tree is very cute and offers interesting ideas If I understand correctly, would everyone have 6 skills? It seems excessive to me, too many activation buttons are not good. I repeat you have good ideas, but we have to develop these tree ideas, that is that at each step a character mu...

It really costs too much ... and there is not in that chest that you said ..

Bellissimo!

Very beautifull

If you can lower the cost a little, and to those few who have spent a little tribute to them, if you have a level, I think it is more honest


But I think you had a wonderful idea. GOOD BOY!

The idea is nice but there are already very long names, then we add 7 more letters of the clan, if everything is not cut left and right, we will see characters with very long writings The problem is that nothing would be read in 0.0 or in almost all places. Even a too long name would come out of the...

I did notice one minor thing you may want to fix if a new revision comes out. For some maps, it says under map 2.-1 (or whatever). For others, it says underground map 2.-1. For search purposes (in the pdf especially), it would be better if it was consistent. I didn't check for consistency of other ...