Re: Spamming Clan Buildings - New Rule
Posted: Sat Sep 28, 2019 10:23 pm
I know, it was cotne... I just happened to quote your post
the official forum
https://forum.dmgamestudio.com/
I know, it was cotne... I just happened to quote your post
Seems i misread how you worded that. You didn't justify (or try to justify) the use of spam. As for both sides being in the wrong, i agree. I also agree that there will be hell to pay for all these abusers, whenever comp (edited) and gets this straightened out.Delta wrote: ↑Sat Sep 28, 2019 10:20 pmWell yeah duh it's his fault for not keeping track of these things and where do you see me trying to justify spam by twisting details seems to me you're the one twisting details now john? I just accused both sides of contributing to this spam dilemma I'VE SEEN BOTH SIDES DO IT on 2.2 lmaooo even tho some are saying they aren't etc and getting all mad about them being accused of it like whattt? Also i wholeheartedly agree every single one who are contributing should be punished I was simply adding to the fact that some of the people clearly forgot that compbatant had no part whatsoever on this rule and what he had specifically said about this rule i was basically adding on to the point where Leone posted above with the link directly bringing you to what ardesia had stated in her post comp doesn't pay attention to these things like rules he leaves it up to the GM's and those rules still stand and those rules are still valid until said otherwise comp only said he didn't understand the rule and such some are using that as an excuse to not follow it which i don't agree. Now does that sound like im twisting details to make it seem like spam is justifiable john?madmaniacal1 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 28, 2019 8:39 pmIf comp missed the details of Rule 14, that's HIS fault for not looking. It has existed for 2 years now, and SETH's "clarification" has for several months.Delta wrote: ↑Sat Sep 28, 2019 8:34 pm Maybe some of you should read what comp posted about this rule again lolll cause so far what nightbaby's said is true both sides spam and when it comes to this rule comp isn't even the one who came up with it don't believe me well check this link out
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=17147&p=117685#p117685
While comp twiddles his thumbs on this issue, massive numbers of players are breaking the rules, which are STILL POSTED and therefore still apply in some capacity.
Don't justify spam by twisting the details.
My earlier post was addressing a few posts above mine and also to add on to what information here on the forum Leone and SellSword had shared
No problem, if you really want justice, then do it.All the chaos that is now in the game was called by the abuse of GM power which you also committed.Punish GM and punish players, do everything honestly for real.Or leave everyone unpunished and get all another chance.There are two choices and the choice is entirely for the compbatant.madmaniacal1 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 26, 2019 7:10 pmBack when APEX existed, no spam rule existed. Your spam actions destroyed APEX, and filled 1/4 of a map with so many unfinished buildings, the map literally crashed. The spam rule (14) was made to fix the issue, since mechanics could not. After that, spam buildings became illegal. Period
That was then. This is now.
Rule 14 still exists in the game rules. Compbatant did not remove that. Therefore, it should be followed. The actions on map 2.2 , of GRUZ/allies AND the clans that were already there, are despicable. BOTH SIDES ARE IN THE WRONG! SPAM WARFARE IS STILL ILLEGAL!
All those involved in this fiasco on 2.2 WILL pay for this down the road. I assure you of that.
Earlier in the thread, Lestat made a curious point, that GRUZ wasn't having to defend their own map, and so had no clue what it was like to defend under current (abused) rule status and mechanics. Perhaps the time has come to change that.
Lol. You still have no clue, do you? 3 years ago, when i was GM, i lost everything bc of abuse. Deleted. Clans. Accounts. Everything. Not jailed. Deleted. Totally had to start from nothing. The only things i did that slipped thru the cracks were the illegal building skills on Rashman, which i believe got fixed (removed) later.Mr_Maks wrote: ↑Sun Sep 29, 2019 12:01 pmNo problem, if you really want justice, then do it.All the chaos that is now in the game was called by the abuse of GM power which you also committed.Punish GM and punish players, do everything honestly for real.Or leave everyone unpunished and get all another chance.There are two choices and the choice is entirely for the compbatant.madmaniacal1 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 26, 2019 7:10 pmBack when APEX existed, no spam rule existed. Your spam actions destroyed APEX, and filled 1/4 of a map with so many unfinished buildings, the map literally crashed. The spam rule (14) was made to fix the issue, since mechanics could not. After that, spam buildings became illegal. Period
That was then. This is now.
Rule 14 still exists in the game rules. Compbatant did not remove that. Therefore, it should be followed. The actions on map 2.2 , of GRUZ/allies AND the clans that were already there, are despicable. BOTH SIDES ARE IN THE WRONG! SPAM WARFARE IS STILL ILLEGAL!
All those involved in this fiasco on 2.2 WILL pay for this down the road. I assure you of that.
Earlier in the thread, Lestat made a curious point, that GRUZ wasn't having to defend their own map, and so had no clue what it was like to defend under current (abused) rule status and mechanics. Perhaps the time has come to change that.
You actually believe that the GMs didn't talk to compbatant, request information, or at least notify compbatant when changes were made? You genuinely believe that? Then you have proven your foolishness.Mr_Maks wrote: ↑Sun Sep 29, 2019 6:55 pm That is, in your opinion, a rule change without notifying the compbatant is normal GM behavior?
The rule by which clan buildings were removed(
"If you wish to take over a clans location you must destroy the established clan base completely. (Do not leave any of the enemy clan buildings standing)was also a new rule that was not allowed by compbatant in his own words
This behavior was not authorized by me.The rules about clan buildings spam were not written by me: viewtopic.php?f=25&t=16946
I didn't authorize them.Nobody asked about my opinion.
I do not want them to leave GM, but I see comments how GM and players what only players will be punished for spamming buildings, but why only players if the rule does not apply only because GM forced compbatant to intervene to cancel it?
Either GM and playerswill be punished bc in this situation there are no innocents or everything else will be forgiven.In this situation not have other decision.Not only players should be punished for this.Point.