Map 4.2.

Clans are a big part of the game. Please post clan-related subjects here!

Moderator: Game Administrators

User avatar
ryaca_
Posts: 1277
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2019 4:32 am

Map 4.2.

Post by ryaca_ » Thu Sep 19, 2019 3:31 am

I removed clans RUS1, RUS2, RUS3, VILA, and BZR from contested areas on map 4.2. where they intentionally left clans arms and FTSS buildings standing so that those clans could not build on any other clan maps.

This is a dirty tactic and a violation of the rules.

"If you wish to take over a clans location you must destroy the established clan base completely. (Do not leave any of the enemy clan buildings standing.) When they have no clan to defend you may then start construction."
El.Menda
Posts: 344
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2019 10:15 am

Re: Map 4.2.

Post by El.Menda » Thu Sep 19, 2019 10:04 am

Por qué se aplican las reglan con tanto retardo ?

No es fácil que el juego no te deje construir ?

Es un fallo demasiado grande en este juego.

Estoy cansado de construir y que todo el esfuerzo de una semana o más desaparezca días después.

No veo justo el modo de juego, ni el modo de aplicar las reglas.

Finalmente conseguirán jugadores cansados y jugadores abandonando el juego
User avatar
compbatant
Site Admin
Posts: 1489
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 12:00 am
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Contact:

Re: Map 4.2.

Post by compbatant » Thu Sep 19, 2019 11:33 am

I restored clan buildings from backup. This behavior was not authorized by me. The rules about clan buildings spam were not written by me: viewtopic.php?f=25&t=16946
I didn't authorize them. Nobody asked about my opinion. I wanted to focus on developing game not on rules or different players problems.
It is time however to clean it up. Rules should be simple and easy to understand for everyone. I read the rules about "clan buildings spam" and I don't understand all of these aspects. Complicated rules can be easy abused.
Unwanted behavior should be blocked by game mechanics not by GM. Please give me some time to improve game mechanics to fix some problems.
User avatar
Lestat
Posts: 458
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2016 6:39 am

Re: Map 4.2.

Post by Lestat » Thu Sep 19, 2019 1:22 pm

compbatant wrote:
Thu Sep 19, 2019 11:33 am
I restored clan buildings from backup. This behavior was not authorized by me. The rules about clan buildings spam were not written by me: viewtopic.php?f=25&t=16946
I didn't authorize them. Nobody asked about my opinion. I wanted to focus on developing game not on rules or different players problems.
It is time however to clean it up. Rules should be simple and easy to understand for everyone. I read the rules about "clan buildings spam" and I don't understand all of these aspects. Complicated rules can be easy abused.
Unwanted behavior should be blocked by game mechanics not by GM. Please give me some time to improve game mechanics to fix some problems.
So does this cancel out the "spam clan" rules ?
We are judged more by our actions than by the words we speak. Remember this, as our actions are a direct result of how we deal with situations, our words can be contemplated and show compassion when in actuality we have none.
rev1
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed May 21, 2014 2:27 am

Re: Map 4.2.

Post by rev1 » Thu Sep 19, 2019 2:02 pm

or any complicated rule compbatant has not confirmed.

Usualy his answer was that it was GM who decides. not to bother him. he was programming.improving game mechanics

most rules are rather complicated
User avatar
madmaniacal1
Posts: 1540
Joined: Mon May 23, 2016 12:29 am

Re: Map 4.2.

Post by madmaniacal1 » Thu Sep 19, 2019 5:34 pm

compbatant wrote:
Thu Sep 19, 2019 11:32 am
I restored clan buildings from backup. This behavior was not authorized by me. The rules about clan buildings spam were not written by me: viewtopic.php?f=25&t=16946
I didn't authorize them. Nobody asked about my opinion. I wanted to focus on developing game not on rules or different players problems.
It is time however to clean it up. Rules should be simple and easy to understand for everyone. I read the rules about "clan buildings spam" and I don't understand all of these aspects. Complicated rules can be easy abused.
Unwanted behavior should be blocked by game mechanics not by GM. Please give me some time to improve game mechanics to fix some problems.
So the fix should NOT be more rules, but better mechanics? Funny. We, as players, HAVE BEEN REQUESTING SUCH FOR YEARS!

And what of the interim? From now until new mechanics are decided, what are we PLAYERS to do? Allow SPAM, since you overturned the ruling? Or continue with the ruling until new mechanics are in game?

WHAT DO YOU EXPECT TO HAPPEN?
Omnes Autem Uri
User avatar
Mr_Maks
Posts: 586
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2016 8:14 am

Re: Map 4.2.

Post by Mr_Maks » Thu Sep 19, 2019 6:04 pm

Don't blame the combatant for now.

It’s only the GM who couldn’t look aside how someone destroy their friends but this is a game and when they applied to GM they accepted GM’s neutrality rules.They created rules that make it impossible to play clan wars. This was the first boiling point.But it seemed to them not enough and they decided to remove the building of the players.There is no excuse for this abuse of power GM.You yourself know this because you got into this situation as well...

Now due to abuse of GM power players will wait for these updates yes.You deserve it.You manipulated GM and they manipulated us.Do not complain that everything is bad when the fault is completely on your team.

KUDOS compbatant!
User avatar
madmaniacal1
Posts: 1540
Joined: Mon May 23, 2016 12:29 am

Re: Map 4.2.

Post by madmaniacal1 » Thu Sep 19, 2019 6:11 pm

Mr_Maks wrote:
Thu Sep 19, 2019 6:04 pm
Don't blame the combatant for now.

It’s only the GM who couldn’t look aside how someone destroy their friends but this is a game and when they applied to GM they accepted GM’s neutrality rules.They created rules that make it impossible to play clan wars. This was the first boiling point.But it seemed to them not enough and they decided to remove the building of the players.There is no excuse for this abuse of power GM.You yourself know this because you got into this situation as well...

Now due to abuse of GM power players will wait for these updates yes.You deserve it.You manipulated GM and they manipulated us.Do not complain that everything is bad when the fault is completely on your team.

KUDOS compbatant!
Oh, STFU... I'm not blaming anyone. I'm not asking for changes, I'm asking for ANSWERS.
Omnes Autem Uri
User avatar
Lestat
Posts: 458
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2016 6:39 am

Re: Map 4.2.

Post by Lestat » Thu Sep 19, 2019 6:19 pm

Maks, is that why your team now spams on a map you control ? There is no waiting for answers, your team bends rules ?
We are judged more by our actions than by the words we speak. Remember this, as our actions are a direct result of how we deal with situations, our words can be contemplated and show compassion when in actuality we have none.
El.Menda
Posts: 344
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2019 10:15 am

Re: Map 4.2.

Post by El.Menda » Thu Sep 19, 2019 6:24 pm

madmaniacal1 wrote:
Thu Sep 19, 2019 5:34 pm
compbatant wrote:
Thu Sep 19, 2019 11:32 am
I restored clan buildings from backup. This behavior was not authorized by me. The rules about clan buildings spam were not written by me: viewtopic.php?f=25&t=16946
I didn't authorize them. Nobody asked about my opinion. I wanted to focus on developing game not on rules or different players problems.
It is time however to clean it up. Rules should be simple and easy to understand for everyone. I read the rules about "clan buildings spam" and I don't understand all of these aspects. Complicated rules can be easy abused.
Unwanted behavior should be blocked by game mechanics not by GM. Please give me some time to improve game mechanics to fix some problems.
So the fix should NOT be more rules, but better mechanics? Funny. We, as players, HAVE BEEN REQUESTING SUCH FOR YEARS!

And what of the interim? From now until new mechanics are decided, what are we PLAYERS to do? Allow SPAM, since you overturned the ruling? Or continue with the ruling until new mechanics are in game?

WHAT DO YOU EXPECT TO HAPPEN?
No es un fallo.
A ver si podemos comprender eso. No es un fallo.
Es un ajuste al juego para hacerlo justo y limpio.
Post Reply