Re: Clan service and the fate of active and inactive clans
Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 3:13 pm
viewtopic.php?p=118484#p118484
Forgotten Tales
the official forum
https://forum.dmgamestudio.com/
Clan service and the fate of active and inactive clans
Page 5 of 5
Re: Clan service and the fate of active and inactive clans
Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 3:30 pm
yes I read it, is good but less funny 
Re: Clan service and the fate of active and inactive clans
Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 4:27 pm
But that is not a "siege" and not what hungry_wolf was talking about. That's just decaying buildings, and of course I knew that.Barkley wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 3:13 pmviewtopic.php?p=118484#p118484
hungry_wolf's idea is to have a [CLAN] that is not a player clan, but one run by the "system" (server) on random maps at random times to siege buildings. Active clans would attack the "[Sys] Siege" clan and protect their buildings.
Inactive clans would have buildings damaged and not repaired, and if other clans on the map did not attack and kill the "[Sys] Siege1 to [Sys] Siege10" (as an example) characters they might just do a LOT of damage or kill an "inactive" clan over time.
Let me add to hungry_wolf's idea: they once they start to attack a clan, they attack all of that clans buildings 24/7/365 or until they are killed. Finished killing off a clan or being killed themselves and the random cycle starts again.
I actually quite like that idea:
Stay tuned, different clan map, different clan attacked, different [Sys]clan time!
Re: Clan service and the fate of active and inactive clans
Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 4:37 pm
+1hungry_wolf wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 2:24 pm I m not involved in clans anymore, but I don't like the idea of inactive clans. if no active clan attacks to check clan survey, I like the idea could exist a 'system clan' that siege randomly, if a clan is really inactive, would be damaged or destroyed. this would wake up some that think to own pieces of the game
moreover, to compensate disturb of attack, who defeat attackers could get a reward. maybe could make game more interesting..
Re: Clan service and the fate of active and inactive clans
Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 5:11 pm
So I misunderstood it. But it is basecly that it damages buildings like what was announced...LostKnight wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 4:27 pmBut that is not a "siege" and not what hungry_wolf was talking about. That's just decaying buildings, and of course I knew that.
hungry_wolf's idea is to have a [CLAN] that is not a player clan, but one run by the "system" (server) on random maps at random times to siege buildings. Active clans would attack the "[Sys] Siege" clan and protect their buildings.
Inactive clans would have buildings damaged and not repaired, and if other clans on the map did not attack and kill the "[Sys] Siege1 to [Sys] Siege10" (as an example) characters they might just do a LOT of damage or kill an "inactive" clan over time.
Let me add to hungry_wolf's idea: they once they start to attack a clan, they attack all of that clans buildings 24/7/365 or until they are killed. Finished killing off a clan or being killed themselves and the random cycle starts again.
I actually quite like that idea:
Stay tuned, different clan map, different clan attacked, different [Sys]clan time!
Re: Clan service and the fate of active and inactive clans
Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 5:40 pm
Re: Clan service and the fate of active and inactive clans
Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 7:10 pm
That's the way I see it also.SellSword wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 2:54 am I would say yes. Clan members are responsible for their own actions and shouldn't be allowed to hide with an argument of "I didn't place it here." How easy would it be to have some low-level alt place spam and others to work on it? Goes for the initial building as well as repairing.
Re: Clan service and the fate of active and inactive clans
Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 7:15 pm
Good idea, +1 Makes clan more noticeable and more active.LostKnight wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 4:27 pmBut that is not a "siege" and not what hungry_wolf was talking about. That's just decaying buildings, and of course I knew that.
hungry_wolf's idea is to have a [CLAN] that is not a player clan, but one run by the "system" (server) on random maps at random times to siege buildings. Active clans would attack the "[Sys] Siege" clan and protect their buildings.
Inactive clans would have buildings damaged and not repaired, and if other clans on the map did not attack and kill the "[Sys] Siege1 to [Sys] Siege10" (as an example) characters they might just do a LOT of damage or kill an "inactive" clan over time.
Let me add to hungry_wolf's idea: they once they start to attack a clan, they attack all of that clans buildings 24/7/365 or until they are killed. Finished killing off a clan or being killed themselves and the random cycle starts again.
I actually quite like that idea:
Stay tuned, different clan map, different clan attacked, different [Sys]clan time!