Safeguarding pets

[Humble_M]

I've played long enough to know that any idea has pros and cons. If we dwell on either of those too long, no changes will happen.

[Leone]

There is that!

[witch]

It would be awesome if we could have \(^.^)/ /pack pet buttom to put only purchased pets in your bag , while you are doing a quest or exploring dangerous areas , + you can use /pack pet to save your pets while a bunch of cowards are bringing lots of monsters to them in a pvp fight .i think thats nice for ppl who likes pvp , also it will help us all if someone starts a big spawn just to kill pets.So when you think its safer for your pets u can use /unpack pet to make them walk by your side again .obviously is not going to be like a house ,u can only put 2 purchased pets in your bag the ones you're currently using .

[Leone]

Probably easier to buy more backpack space

[LostKnight]

Probably easier to buy more backpack space

Did I miss something? Extra backpack space to safeguard pets?

[SellSword]

If your backpack was full I don't think storing pets could be allowed (just going along with the idea), and if your pets were carrying anything that would mean dropping enough items to leave 1-2 empty spots for pets. That could be messy.

[witch]

I preffer to lose items than pets , i usally use my bags to carry materials , and i put the must important items on my 2 main bags that way u cant lose them (in case one of my pets die ), u can drop items but u can get them back if u /unpack pets before the items start to disappearing (^.^)

[madmaniacal1]

Great ideas - I just have a bad feeling about this one though; namely how unscrupulous players could learn coordinates and send their pets to claim xp from a different (safer?) part of the screen.

It's no different to walking the pet there and /waiting it.

There is a very subtle but (in my mind at least) very important difference. Currently, some players would not dare walk up and /wait their pets for fear of being attacked. The proposed method removes that barrier.

What naturally follows? Abusing it as a tactic.

Just my rather cynical thoughts: if I'm wrong, I'm wrong!

Any player would be able to move sieges into tanking position of a clan build with no risk of accidental death by said build. Aren't these sieges strong enough without buffing their ability to destroy?