Page 1 of 2

Bad Equipment - survey

Posted: Sun Jan 12, 2020 11:34 pm
by Syor
Hiiiii

I think some equipment is really, really bad, and some are perfect
Obviously my opinion.

But if this were the opinion of several, why not put all the ugliest ones to the vote, and the "winner" is changed or changed.???


I think the most beautiful team is the 3k one in the desert.The worst is undoubtedly the 1k weapons.

Re: Bad Equipment - survey

Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2020 12:22 am
by SellSword
You are wondering what gear looks nice and what gear does not?

Re: Bad Equipment - survey

Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2020 9:23 am
by Syor
Yes just like this.

Re: Bad Equipment - survey

Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2020 3:03 pm
by Zeldris
I don't like lvl 350 gear

Re: Bad Equipment - survey

Posted: Mon Jan 13, 2020 3:17 pm
by Lestat
im not sure the point of this thread. i remember when after 100 you waited to 250 for gear, then waited until 500. whether or not you like the appearance is minimal. aside from looking at stat page in bag, you never see it anyway.(beside weapon) be glad all arent just dull gray.

you could better the game by perhaps designing gears for the levels that dont have them. like 400,450,550,600,650,700,800,850,900,950,1100,1200,1300,1400,1600 etc...maybe not every 50 levels,but you see the point?

Re: Bad Equipment - survey

Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2020 8:11 am
by Syor
I think that an update and a restyling to the ugliest graphics must be a normal and incentive thing.

A game like this constantly updated, very lively and very popular, must update even the small aspects such as an image or a complete set that is considered ugly or dated

For the matter of adding new sets, I would add a few more than 1k, expect 500 or 1000 levels for a new set, and they are also very difficult to obtain
( Or craft in clan or buy to 0.0 at High High High price).


So I say yes, I would like to change the 1k lightning weapons and make them more beautiful, and I would add sets to 1250-1750-2250-2500-2750

Designing them is simple in my opinion, but I would create these extra sets with very few improvements added compared to the previous one, and which are more easily obtainable

My thought.

If you agree, it won't take me anything to tear something down

Re: Bad Equipment - survey

Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2020 8:20 am
by Syor
Some pictures taken online.

Just change them a little .....

Re: Bad Equipment - survey

Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 9:02 pm
by madmaniacal1
Are these images "open source", and therefore free for the public to use for their own purposes?
If so, these images look great for a start.
If not, adding them to FT (or even recolored variants) is a violation of international copyright law, and FT doesn't need that.

Re: Bad Equipment - survey

Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 9:18 pm
by LostKnight
madmaniacal1 wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2020 9:02 pm
Are these images "open source", and therefore free for the public to use for their own purposes?
If so, these images look great for a start.
If not, adding them to FT (or even recolored variants) is a violation of international copyright law, and FT doesn't need that.
pinterest says they come from artstation[dot]com and it looks like they "sell" prints.

Stay on the safe side: not open source.
bur More by Alexander Griggs-Burr does have a very nice collection

Re: Bad Equipment - survey

Posted: Sat Jan 18, 2020 1:32 pm
by Syor
madmaniacal1 wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2020 9:02 pm
Are these images "open source", and therefore free for the public to use for their own purposes?
If so, these images look great for a start.
If not, adding them to FT (or even recolored variants) is a violation of international copyright law, and FT doesn't need that.
This was my doubt, it's true and FT doesn't have to risk anything

However, I ask myself: use them as a basis to create something different .... any changes .... shouldn't they solve the problem?