Forgotten Tales

To borrow a quote of mine from another thread that was dragging it off topic.

So I made new topic: PvP and Non-PvP with a simple poll that will run for 90 days.
Think before you check an option, you cannot change later.
The poll it just to see where it goes, nothing official. My Vote: 2

LostKnight wrote: ↑Sun Mar 07, 2021 5:12 pm I still like the idea if you are NOT in a clan there is NO PvP possible.
You want PvP:
1. join a clan, or
2. create your own clan

Then I don't care if it is 100% chance of dropping ALL items if you loose the fight.

I have been talking about this for 3 years.
A lot of people like it, a lot of people do not like it. Others are noncommital
- It seems compbatant does not like it or has never seen it.

This game has the built in ability of having a PvP aspect and a non-PvP aspect already built into it:

1. CLAN = PvP, quest, grind, craft, buy houses, pets et al
2. No CLAN = No PvP, quest, grind, craft, buy houses, pets et al

I am NOT in a clan, I do not like PvP, never have.
- A few years ago I was attacked by 2 people at the same time.
- I "Log off" and that's my game since PvL(og Off)
- I have been "hunted" where the PvPer will just sit where I log off waiting for me to log on.
- - at times, if possible I send an alt to watch the area. If he leaves, I log back on.

- recently I was attacked by 3 people at the same time.
- - I waited a while logged on they were waiting - logged off!
- - - I sent an alt, they finally left.
- - - - I was pale yellow when they left and I logged on.
- - - - add insult to injury, one of those three, red name, not hard to miss, green chatted me on Map 0.0 - and even more recently while surrounded and fighting a mob of hungry-devourers, I was attacked.
- - the COWARDS take advantage anyway they can.

If this doesn't fall under:
- Rule 9. Reducing game-playing experience of others!
- Rule 9 b. Harassment
I don't know what does.

BUT I guess because PvP is a part of the game, it doesn't matter that a PvPer is "Reducing game-playing experience of others" and doesn't count as Harassment either even though there was 2 or 3 against 1.

my vote
if you like pvp join clan

I've chosen option 3, and my reason has been discussed in a different thread.

Keep pvp as it is, but drastically reduce the % drop chance.

uhm. Interesting.

I think our characters always live in this world all together.

I think it's normal to be attacked by thieves, but to remedy misconduct there is the 3-level rul I think the pvp must remain unchanged.

Then we must also consider that what you suggest exists in purchases, the pvp protection.

I don't like pvp, but if I wanted to do it with friends, or just to play in a different way, then I couldn't do it anymore, and I wouldn't like it.


I would have to join a clan to have a fight with friends, and I don't like it


I do not like.

I can't say I like/hate pvp. However, I like fair and prepared pvp, rather than being ambushed or even beaten.Or, today I don't want pvp, I just want lvl up, but the hunters have been pestering me and harassing me. I can't even refuse.This is passive. I have an idea to add free pvp protection or buy it with gold(yes, I have to admit that it is too expensive to buy it with $).If we have the right to choose pvp independently, it will be a great thing. Unless we join clan, pvp should not be forced.

#3 i like being in a clan but a peaceful clan im not into pvp im also a pvl ( get attacked and log out) normally im only attacked by players 1000 + lvls higher then me so i have very little chance anyway. i dont think we should lose xp and drop equipment for being peaceful. if there was no drop people could pk and it wouldnt bother me as much.

Blackbetty wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 5:40 pm #3
{snip}
i dont think we should lose xp and drop equipment for being peaceful. if there was no drop people could pk and it wouldnt bother me as much.

agree x100

This part of PvP destroys the game for peaceful players.

WHAT WILL OUTLAW BE FOR IF U CANT ATTACK PEOPLE NOT IN CLAN THIS IS STUPID

I'm not sure about the capital letters, but I have an idea - which has been shared with others - about drastically changing outlaw status from what it is now to a punishment for the time someone is outlaw.

As it is today, outlaw status pays lip service to what it should be.