Re: WARBRINGER's Idea Thread
Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2020 1:49 am
The profit isn't always the gold, just sometimes your style of playing. I'm all for that.
Page 2 of 2
Re: AUTO MUTE
Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2020 7:30 pm
Currently, we have a distinct shortage of GameMasters to moderate the chat, and so many players are repeatedly spamming the chat day in and day out - what if, if you send the same message or too many messages in a row, the system auto mutes you for a set period of time. For example, on your first offense, the system mutes you for 10 minutes. On your second offense, the system mutes you for an hour. And on your third offense, the system mutes you for a day. Any further offenses are permanently in place until a GM looks into the case.
Re: Siege Weapon Targetting
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 6:50 pm
MAKE SIEGES INDIVIDUAL TARGETS
As it is, I see sieges as an unnecessary advantage during PvP, especially considering they can be maneuvered to make it impossible for you to attack the opponent's character if, for example, you are stunned with no anti-freeze pots
My suggestion is simple; allow players to select and deselect siege weapons for attacking, like you do players. Not sure what implications this may have, or what players' opinions on it will be, but feel free to leave your feedback.
As it is, I see sieges as an unnecessary advantage during PvP, especially considering they can be maneuvered to make it impossible for you to attack the opponent's character if, for example, you are stunned with no anti-freeze pots
My suggestion is simple; allow players to select and deselect siege weapons for attacking, like you do players. Not sure what implications this may have, or what players' opinions on it will be, but feel free to leave your feedback.Re: WARBRINGER's Idea Thread
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 7:09 pm
I absolutely agree with you and I did with MM two years ago. Let's hope this happens for the very reasons you give.
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=7461&p=97562&hilit=Siege#p97562
(Edit- not my best attempt at copying a link. Scroll up to MM's post 20 April 2018 for the one I mean!)
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=7461&p=97562&hilit=Siege#p97562
(Edit- not my best attempt at copying a link. Scroll up to MM's post 20 April 2018 for the one I mean!)
Re: WARBRINGER's Idea Thread
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 7:43 pm
Quite some time ago I was fighting red monsters under Silverwood. Some player with sieges dragged a swarm on me. That wasn't a huge issue by itself as I could have taken out all 8 of the mobs (as a swordsman), but then he positioned a siege around me when I killed one mob and I automatically attacked the siege.
Why in the world would a non-clan player who did not attack or get attacked by this other player ever be forced to attack a siege?
Just make sieges to be used for sieges. That's my thought.
Why in the world would a non-clan player who did not attack or get attacked by this other player ever be forced to attack a siege?
Just make sieges to be used for sieges. That's my thought.
Re: WARBRINGER's Idea Thread
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 9:28 pm
Well balsita do add something more to pvp. I don't think it's a problem only sometimes it's so silly to run around in circles and someone can still position his ballista that he can't be hit..
Anyway I do like how you can fight easyer with balista if not it's something every one can abuse
Anyway I do like how you can fight easyer with balista if not it's something every one can abuse