Forgotten Tales

rearrow wrote: Thu Mar 08, 2018 5:26 am @ryaca
you are allowed to post of course.

but you talk about no activity and if you are not involved in running a clan you may not be aware of much of the activity going on.

now im spending a lot of time on clan business typing this, but you wont see me on the map.
several hours a day are spend in chats with other dukes, potential new clanmembers or allies, etc.
so not seeing anyone on a map doeant say they are not doing clan business.

furter more you make general acquisations, but refuse to give examples to prove them.

you dont give people the chance to defend themselves

One thing all GM members admid is that they do not know much about clan bussibess and clans. it results from their role in ft. so sending them a private list of dead clans, just creates a lot of work for them.
why not just post here and give the clans a way to react . if they dont it makes your case stronger.

but doing it like this just makes it looks like your on some private vendetta. im sure thats not the case but it looks like it.

rearrow wrote: Thu Mar 08, 2018 5:37 am about smaller clans on clan maps:
In many of the bigger clans people take care of eachother and have different roles in clan as explained before.
One reward for loyalty is that some who want to establish their own clan get help and the original clan (and allies) helps with building. and they are likely to ally.
these new clans have their own dukes but of course there are friendship bonds.
It also leads to interesting situations where another ally attacks the new clan and the 'sponsor'
has to choose what to do since both are allies.
this part is a major headache and can take up lots of off-game diplomavy

Ryaca wrote: Thu Mar 08, 2018 4:59 am

Cleopatra wrote: Thu Mar 08, 2018 4:20 am Just because you don't see the members of that particular clan it doesn't mean they're not active.
For example, most people won't see the members of rdt, but you'll see some members of Trek.
-1.2 might look a little inactive, but you would be wrong.
We have members that watch that map like a hawk and prove it pretty quickly if we're under attack.
So just because you don't see them doesn't mean they're not active and doesn't mean they are not watching their clans of course, I guess you can always knock on the door and see if anyone's home

I already talked about how they are watched. Thank you for your feedback. So are you for or against the clan upkeep idea?

Cleopatra wrote: Thu Mar 08, 2018 1:13 pm

Ryaca wrote: Thu Mar 08, 2018 4:59 am

Cleopatra wrote: Thu Mar 08, 2018 4:20 am Just because you don't see the members of that particular clan it doesn't mean they're not active.
For example, most people won't see the members of rdt, but you'll see some members of Trek.
-1.2 might look a little inactive, but you would be wrong.
We have members that watch that map like a hawk and prove it pretty quickly if we're under attack.
So just because you don't see them doesn't mean they're not active and doesn't mean they are not watching their clans of course, I guess you can always knock on the door and see if anyone's home

I already talked about how they are watched. Thank you for your feedback. So are you for or against the clan upkeep idea?

It just depends on what the upkeep would imply...
If it would be like some small dilapidation of the buildings and walls that's understandable. In fact, I've always liked that idea. Just like in real life weather damages buildings, not a whole bunch but a little.