round 1
5-1* i so rich
4-1* fiora
3+2 Pyrolocke
2+2 wow paulo
1+2 receveo
0+2 NightShade
-1+2 Wade
* upon considering screenshots I reveal cooperation in the very first round: let's pretend NightShade was randomly picked as a target first. By fiora and "i so rich". But then i so rich, having perfect opportunity to kill wow paulo in a few swift strokes, chooses to join the hunt for receveo, joining fiora and Pyrolocke. But as they finish receveo, wow paulo IS the first target. Clan feuds, just as clan cooperation, should ALWAYS be left behind the entrance gate of this event.
round 2
5-1* Kheiron
4-2* fiora
3-1 Pyrolocke
2-2 i so rich
1+4 receveo
0+4 wow paulo
-1+4 Wade
-2+4 DOOMSDAY
-3+4 NightShade
* "-N" signifies a penalty of N points, while the rest move up, having points added - as many, as there are fined players over them in the position table of the round. The fine is applied for cooperation. This time, BK members, Pyrolocke and 'i so rich'. I really dislike cooperation at this event, and will always penalize for it! Of course, the penalty moves winners far deeper, that they would be, if they played fairly. But it's supposed to! You lose more than you win by breaking rules!
round 3
5-2* Pyrolocke
4-2* Kheiron
3-3* fiora
2+3 receveo
1+3 NightShade
0+3 wow paulo
-1+3 SrRajoy
-2+3 i so rich
* repeat offence gets +1 point in fines.
Also, as example of 'i so rich' in this round shows, it is unwise to leave low-level players alive, when there is risk of getting killed first
round 4
5 i so rich
4-2* fiora
3+1 Pyrolocke
2+1 wow paulo
1-2* Kheiron
0+2 receveo
DOOMSDAY
0 SrLancelot -ran or logged, absent on sc N, present on sc N+1
SrDani - ran to the buses, then returned
WolfCrow - bushes and back, was teleported away
NightShade - late for the start
devilcrazy - came in the middle of round
* just before this round [BK] were claiming, that mages are biggest danger. so why, when NightShade is absent, they don't start with 'i so rich'? receveo is taken out first instead.
round 5
5 fiora
4 receveo
3 Pyrolocke
2 i so rich
1 SrLancelot
0 wow paulo
0 NightShade
devilcrazy - logged or left, absent for the mid-round, appears closer to the end
This was the first relatively clean round. NightShade is taken out first, but in this case it's acceptable, because he IS the most dangerous one in the round 1vs1.
Or, maybe, as I said earlier: "karma is an itch"
round 6
5 NightShade
4 receveo
3 fiora
2 DOOMSDAY
1 Pyrolocke
0 i so rich - logged off/lagged off, disqualified for the round - sorry, but other players can not be held responsible for your bad connection. they were fighting and losing health and/or mana, skill usage time, while you were offline. try to understand that it is fair.
* one could assert that there was DR cooperation, but i disagree: from the beginning receveo and NightShade were fighting in different corners against different enemies.
Final score:
23 receveo(6) - staff 250
18 Pyrolocke(6) - gold token amulet given
----prize limit cut-off *----
16 fiora(6)
14 wow paulo(5) - yet another special 'encouraging' prize for participation in spite of overwhelming force of the higher-level opponents! - lvl 100 item! **
12 i so rich(6)
12 NightShade(5)
07 Kheiron(3)
04 DOOMSDAY(3)
04 Wade(2)
02 SrRajoy(1)
* this is determined each event separately, depending on total number of participants and number of rounds they played in. in this case, only 6 players qualify as consistent participants, having fought in 5 rounds or more( >= 2/3 of total number of rounds).
So, 2 prizes for 6 contestants - I consider this to be not bad at all.
** Special prize is there to encourage all players to participate, not only close-to-upper-limit of the event tier.