Clan buildings and sieges big balance update

stay tuned

Moderator: Game Administrators

User avatar
Khmer
Posts: 291
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2017 9:07 am

Re: Clan buildings and sieges big balance update

Post by Khmer »

Sieging should be considered an attack and therefore the 11sec log rule should be applied!
User avatar
MadMikael
Posts: 3303
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2014 5:54 pm
Location: Windsor, Ontario, Canada (EST time zone)

Re: Clan buildings and sieges big balance update

Post by MadMikael »

Khmer wrote:Sieging should be considered an attack and therefore the 11sec log rule should be applied!
Agreed.
RETIRED [GM] - Game Master

Please contact GM Inbox for help if you need it.

⬇️ GM Inbox contact link ⬇️
ucp.php?i=pm&mode=compose&u=9711
NightBaby
Posts: 509
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2017 6:43 pm
Location: Candy Land

Re: Clan buildings and sieges big balance update

Post by NightBaby »

I think sieging should not be considered a trade and all classes should have the "1" affinity. That way swordsman can have 1.5 in chopping wood and dwarf can have 1.25. I think it makes it more fair to players who spend a long time to build a tower and have it get destroyed in a few hours.
Does life really get better?
User avatar
hungry_wolf
Posts: 728
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2016 10:25 am
Location: Italy

Re: Clan buildings and sieges big balance update

Post by hungry_wolf »

NightBaby wrote:I think sieging should not be considered a trade and all classes should have the "1" affinity. That way swordsman can have 1.5 in chopping wood and dwarf can have 1.25. I think it makes it more fair to players who spend a long time to build a tower and have it get destroyed in a few hours.
Agree
Sword dislike sieging - hungrywolf
Dwarf dislike mining - tarvos
Archer dislike crafting - matcauthon
Ogre dislike fishing - heimdall
Mage dislike magic - ogonbat

Member of Ignobili of Ft

Duke of dead clan FTFR
Post Reply