Forgotten Tales

I figured a little.
As a result, from above a certain level, I found that level 5 ice bow deals much more damage than higher level bow.
In my example, at level 195(If the str exceeds 400) it became stronger than the level 150 bow.
Although it is extremely limited strength, I thought I would continue holding possession of Ice bow.
Just so cool !!

yes sometimes it doesn't pay to upgrade to the next level gear

Totally agree with Nahgus. There are times when it doesn't pay to upgrade, or the upgrade is essentially a wash. A swordsman can upgrade to a 200 sword with more damage, but has a range of only one, so keeping a bit less damage with a 175 sword that has a range of two might be a better option. I suppose you need to look at all the stats and what you will be doing.

Still, I'd encourage you to hold on to that diamond bow.

Sorry.I did not have enough words.
The strength of the ice bow will also depend on the strength of the enemy unit. My example is a crazy lion.
Ice bow has very limited strength, but I will keep it in the bag without throwing it away.
It will be useful if the level gets really high. Perhaps surely.
I will calculate it in my spare time.

SellSword wrote: ↑Sat Dec 01, 2018 6:17 pm Totally agree with Nahgus. There are times when it doesn't pay to upgrade, or the upgrade is essentially a wash. A swordsman can upgrade to a 200 sword with more damage, but has a range of only one, so keeping a bit less damage with a 175 sword that has a range of two might be a better option. I suppose you need to look at all the stats and what you will be doing.

Still, I'd encourage you to hold on to that diamond bow.

that is a perfect example

Like my name says, LostKnight, I got lost in the halls of the forum so didn't see this in a timely manner.

HOWEVER, let me add my 2¢ worth for the the poor swordsman. If a picture paints a thousand words here's 5000 words worth of why a level 30 swordsman should keep his level 30 "Light Sword" until he gets his level 50 "Claymore".

→ 30 to 50: Show

30-50.jpg

Look at the Light Sword(30), Range 2, with a shield vs the Double Blade(40), Range 1 with no shield.

OBVIOUSLY the Double Sword is something to sell to a shop keeper .... or an enemy

Well that's the opinion of this LostKnight for what it's worth.

The swordsman - the only character in the game that has to fight one-on-one, up close and personal his entire life.

I need a blade made by Remington: LostKnight's Remington-12Guage Sword. aka: LK's R12G Sword

LostKnight wrote: ↑Wed Dec 05, 2018 1:47 am The swordsman - the only character in the game that has to fight one-on-one, up close and personal his entire life.

I don't understand this - what about ogre and dwarf? what am I missing?

blitzcraig wrote: ↑Wed Dec 05, 2018 2:35 am

LostKnight wrote: ↑Wed Dec 05, 2018 1:47 am The swordsman - the only character in the game that has to fight one-on-one, up close and personal his entire life.

I don't understand this - what about ogre and dwarf? what am I missing?

Dwarf: Level 60 - Fury: Attack at the same time all enemies. Hardly one on one!

Ogre: OK, my error he too is one-on-one but look at his skills:

(30) -Double damage skill.
(60) -Stun hint: Reduces enemy life by 25% and mana by 50%.
(100) -Twister attack: Every time enemy hits you he loses 2% of his life.

I use my fire sword skill and I loose 10% of MY health!

ok, gotcha - yeah, sword is def better for PvP while those are better PvM

blitzcraig wrote: ↑Wed Dec 05, 2018 3:38 am ok, gotcha - yeah, sword is def better for PvP while those are better PvM

And I'm a PvM kinda Knight.