Newest AFK system

[Gullander]

My mage hieronymus was fishing at 0.0 and was making a trade when a bot screen came up. I had time to complete the transaction but was a few seconds later kicked off. Somehow this needs to supercede the other so you cannot complete whatever you are doing when it comes up so not penalized for playing the game honestly.

Or better yet it seems to me if someone is chatting or trading when it comes up those activities in themselves prove someone is actively playing and the test should disengage without any kicking off and reset to try again after a certain time passes. Just an idea...if possible.

[Defkano]

My mage hieronymus was fishing at 0.0 and was making a trade when a bot screen came up. I had time to complete the transaction but was a few seconds later kicked off. Somehow this needs to supercede the other so you cannot complete whatever you are doing when it comes up so not penalized for playing the game honestly.

Or better yet it seems to me if someone is chatting or trading when it comes up those activities in themselves prove someone is actively playing and the test should disengage without any kicking off and reset to try again after a certain time passes. Just an idea...if possible.

+1

[mYHome]

My mage hieronymus was fishing at 0.0 and was making a trade when a bot screen came up. I had time to complete the transaction but was a few seconds later kicked off. Somehow this needs to supercede the other so you cannot complete whatever you are doing when it comes up so not penalized for playing the game honestly.

Or better yet it seems to me if someone is chatting or trading when it comes up those activities in themselves prove someone is actively playing and the test should disengage without any kicking off and reset to try again after a certain time passes. Just an idea...if possible.

bad idea! you ask me why ??? For example, a player turns on a bot that writes letters and then deletes them while standing and killing monster! He will use a bot and the game will think he is writing a chat!

[SellSword]

That's pretty much true for any system or any exceptions is that people will try to abuse it.

[Gullander]

Yes where there is a restriction someone eventually will find a way around it. I thought later adding chat to my idea might be problematic. Any other ideas? Doing a legitimate honest function of the game shouldn't kick you off though because the check does not recognize it as so. In my example what was I to do? The player had already set his payment so I clicked on the item to sell and messed up the bot question. I could have cancelled the sale but I suspect anything I pressed would have been wrong. I am fully in favor of these restrictions and hopefully won't happen very often, but if there is a way I hope it can be adjusted or added.

[sedak]

Today ive got question "is this weapon?" with empty box. Answered "no" and got kicked from server

[Gullander]

Some of the "blood items" are very dark in color. If it is night or you are on a dark background or have a small screen it is very hard to see. I had a similar thing happen it looked like a very dark square and was too dark to know exactly what it was so guessed not a weapon but honestly haven't any idea what it was. I think limiting the item id# to brighter items only would be a help instead of whole library of weapons or armament.

[merisajan]

I did not read the text, I just checked correctly
And it seemed like it was right and I stayed in the game
Next time I will try to read and answer correctly
what a exiting challenge

[cotne7]

but low levels dont know what is weapon and what is not...so i advice that: players under level 200 should not have afk checker.

[justj99]

I think everyone can make a pretty good guess about whether every sword, bow, club, staff, or axe is a weapon, and that boots, hats/helms, robes, chest plate, rings, or amulets are not...