Report thread discussion.

[Ayoub]

Yes enemy’s list have max 16 names (red names) if new player atk u oldest 1 ll remove . And if u kill a player in ur list his name ll remove (it won’t remove if u both in clans).

-If u atk a red name and u couldn’t kill him he stay’s in ur list .
-If red name killed u 5 times he ll be outlaw .
-If u atk red name and u make him low red hp and another player finished him he stay’s in ur list .
- if u are outlaw and a player atk u (killed u or not) ,he ll be in ur list and u can see him red ( this one need be fix ).
-if low lvl atk u ( added to ur list) and he pass u in lvls u can still see him red and atk him and u won’t be in his list until u kill him, then if u atk him again u ll be in his list .(and if u atk him and u died or u run or log out he sty in ur list ).

[Lestat]

How about this for an easy fix. Ammend the rules to include:

Dragging a spawn onto another player/pets for the purpose of pvp is forbidden, any incident found to violate this results in .....

Set the punishment n

[Akkilles]

There are limits to how many times a player can break the rules, how they break the rules, why they broke the rules and in what situation this happened.
A decision must be made after an investigation of the entire situation and it is required to consider every aspect of the situation. For example as I mentioned so many times in other post, it takes 2 players to form a conflict. The reporter must be included in the investigation.
In some situations, it is more difficult to decide on a punishment. Sometimes it can take a whole week before we can decide if punishments are sustainable.
I see a lot of good ideas here in this thread about different punishments but some things require an update before we can implement new things.

[Akkilles]

A player who was caught killing another's pet. Took his responsibility to act on it. With the help of GM they met in a safely place to talk this situation thru .
The player apologized and restored his pets.

Thank you both. It's very nice of you to meet each other with respect. The GM team appreciate that player's like you both exist in this game.

[DAVEmanda]

I’m going to say sorry cause I didint see this thread.

Anyway I feel that Nahuel is not the person indicated for a report. Cause he is breaking rules. So if he want to make a report , he should get enough stuff and probs. What kind of report is that screenshot? Not all people read forum.

I can remember you the block path is not vs game rules. But break game xp is. So if he blocks the path 5mins is ok . What he can't do is block for hours..

Now a GM said can't block that path. But you must remember that not all people are active on forum and there wasn't any rule modification...


So what we are talking here?


Get good stuff and summit a good report

[Akkilles]

Update

viewtopic.php?p=144475#p144475

[Akkilles]

moqtada 3
and
JINNX

Both of you have done wrong. According to the rules, you have both violated rule 9.
You have both provoked each other. "Don't feed the trolls".

[moqtada 1000]

moqtada 3
and
JINNX

Both of you have done wrong. According to the rules, you have both violated rule 9.
You have both provoked each other. "Don't feed the trolls".

What about this talk? Mistakes. I'm ok. This is good. I broke the rule 9, and it is 9. Breaking it is the rule 8. It does not make me develop my personality. He has transgressed on my religion.

[Ayoub]

Translation say nothing about ur religion it’s lie .
He said u are idiot and i think u understand it .
+ u can ignore all this by clicking the hand above his head . why u make it complicated…

[Chrollo]

I insult ur relegion are u a kid I am a Muslim too how I will insult my own relegion. Grow up kid .