PUNISHMENT

[SK1976]

hello. I have an idea to make it more understanding for players who got punishments.

In this game every acc has an "i" (Info) section.

If a player would be jailed or got any other punishment leave in the info a short text about what "RULE" that acc has broken and what or how long that player whould be punished because it.
We need the GMs name of who has punished that acc.

per example:

"i":

YOUR ACC. HAS BEEING JAILED FOR XX DAYS because breaking RULE: XXX
TIME: XX.XX - DATE: XX.XX.XXXX
by GM: XXXXXX




Than everyone in this game is seeing it clear what he has done and knows fr what and who has punished him.






To leave NO info is very unfair for punished players.

They dont et any chance to reply or talk about anything.


THAT MAKES IT CLEAR FOR BOTH SIDES.



Talk about i, and please insert it into game.




This game wants in a bad direction again.


Please update it !!!!




Greetings.....SK

[Lorion]

hello. I have an idea to make it more understanding for players who got punishments.

In this game every acc has an "i" (Info) section.

If a player would be jailed or got any other punishment leave in the info a short text about what "RULE" that acc has broken and what or how long that player whould be punished because it.
We need the GMs name of who has punished that acc.

per example:

"i":

YOUR ACC. HAS BEEING JAILED FOR XX DAYS because breaking RULE: XXX
TIME: XX.XX - DATE: XX.XX.XXXX
by GM: XXXXXX




Than everyone in this game is seeing it clear what he has done and knows fr what and who has punished him.






To leave NO info is very unfair for punished players.

They dont et any chance to reply or talk about anything.


THAT MAKES IT CLEAR FOR BOTH SIDES.



Talk about i, and please insert it into game.




This game wants in a bad direction again.


Please update it !!!!




Greetings.....SK

Interesting idea could be fun to have it i agree

[Aogon]

Consider that often the players who have "no idea" may have been afk when jailed, and maybe it's not so confusing for a lot of cases. Some players also just like to argue and claim they weren't given a reason despite the opposite being true. Thankfully, most players aren't like that.

What we normally do is send a message (not chat) to the player who was jailed if they weren't online at the time. That usually works, but may not always.

All that said, it's an interesting suggestion.

[Gullander]

If implemented I think the by who should be left out. I think the reason and that the GM team thought it warranted is enough. If a GM has dealt fairly he shouldn't be afraid to add his name as the one involved, but seeing the recent "blaming" in posts I think it better to leave it as a GM team decision not an individual decision.

[SK1976]

i think NO

[SK1976]

Its a proof for both sides.

[LostKnight]

If implemented I think the by who should be left out.

I agree with this.
For this reason that Gull stated:

but seeing the recent "blaming" in posts I think it better to leave it blank

And there is also the rather common knowledge that GM's have been threatened by players.
blank added by me.

That fact the "text" is added to the (i) area is enough to know it was a GM or Admin that put it there.
Maybe in a different colour so player can't fake it!
Normal players cannot edit an other's (i) area.

I'd also suggest that the text once added can only be edited/removed by a GM/Admin not the person "wearing it".

[cotne7]

Release all perm jailed accounts with 30%lvls reducation!!!!bring old players back

[cotne7]

Perm jailtoo bad...better 3 yrs jailor something else

[cotne7]

I missed those old legends