Lvls difference in pvp protect
Moderator: Game Administrators
Lvls difference in pvp protect
I think its 3 or 4 lvls difference.i mean:if player is 3 or 4 lvls lower then you,you cant attack him/her becouse of enemy is too weak.this rule was from the beggining of game and never changed becouse no too high lvls in game.but now there are alot high lvls in game.i think 5k player should be able to attack 4k player if they are unclanned.becouse there are many chances 4k player can win to 5k player.please balance those caps in pvp lvls.am i right what do you guys think?
cotne7 Mage lvl 7000
cotne Archer lvl 200
tsotne0 ogre lvl 157
cotne Archer lvl 200
tsotne0 ogre lvl 157
Re: Lvls difference in pvp protect
800 lvl should be able to attack 750 and so on...
cotne7 Mage lvl 7000
cotne Archer lvl 200
tsotne0 ogre lvl 157
cotne Archer lvl 200
tsotne0 ogre lvl 157
Re: Lvls difference in pvp protect
Cotne the killer xD .
Yes i like the idea especially vs mages ( cus low lvls mage can win and survive against higher lvls )
they should make it not 3 or 4 lvls but i think 5% or 10% from his lvl .
Exemple :
If u are 10k u able to atk 9k player (10% of ur lvl)
Yes i like the idea especially vs mages ( cus low lvls mage can win and survive against higher lvls )
they should make it not 3 or 4 lvls but i think 5% or 10% from his lvl .
Exemple :
If u are 10k u able to atk 9k player (10% of ur lvl)
#We're all in the same game, just different levels#
#Dealing with the same hell, just different devils#
#Calmness is the cradle of power#
#Dealing with the same hell, just different devils#
#Calmness is the cradle of power#
Re: Lvls difference in pvp protect
NON CLAN is 3 ± ... if you are in a clan there is no limit ... so why are non clan people fighting ... this is NOT a PVP game, it IS a RPG with pvp potentials ... if a player is non clan they should not be FORCED INTO PVP!!!cotne7 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 18, 2024 12:10 am I think its 3 or 4 lvls difference.i mean:if player is 3 or 4 lvls lower then you,you cant attack him/her becouse of enemy is too weak.this rule was from the beggining of game and never changed becouse no too high lvls in game.but now there are alot high lvls in game.i think 5k player should be able to attack 4k player if they are unclanned.becouse there are many chances 4k player can win to 5k player.please balance those caps in pvp lvls.am i right what do you guys think?
That being said, this post is not needed for discussion...
SUGGESTIONS:
Clan Duke Helper (Post Thu Jun 23, 2016)
Clan pet storage (Post Tue Nov 22, 2016)
Outlaw penalty (Post Tue Nov 22, 2016)
Gear UpGrades (Post Thu Feb 22, 2018)
[ok] Rothost (D)- Amazon
[SMRF] Rothosta (L)- Huntress
[WAAR] Roth (D)- Freya
Clan Duke Helper (Post Thu Jun 23, 2016)
Clan pet storage (Post Tue Nov 22, 2016)
Outlaw penalty (Post Tue Nov 22, 2016)
Gear UpGrades (Post Thu Feb 22, 2018)
[ok] Rothost (D)- Amazon
[SMRF] Rothosta (L)- Huntress
[WAAR] Roth (D)- Freya
Re: Lvls difference in pvp protect
Nothing is preventing the lower level players from attacking higher levels. The intent is to reduce "bullying" by higher levels of lower levels. At the higher levels, I'd have to agree that more than 3 levels could be easily allowed, but I (personally) don't see the point in opening more non-clanned players up to potential abuse from higher level players.
- LostKnight
- Posts: 6421
- Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2017 8:02 pm
- Location: Rockhiem nord i Steinhus nær Kedington
Re: Lvls difference in pvp protect
Totally agree with this.Rothost wrote: ↑Thu Apr 18, 2024 2:57 pm NON CLAN is 3 ± ... if you are in a clan there is no limit ... so why are non clan people fighting ... this is NOT a PVP game, it IS a RPG with pvp potentials ... if a player is non clan they should not be FORCED INTO PVP!!!
That being said, this post is not needed for discussion...
I'll fight for what I think is right!
Re: Lvls difference in pvp protect
I think so too.Rothost wrote: ↑Thu Apr 18, 2024 2:57 pm NON CLAN is 3 ± ... if you are in a clan there is no limit ... so why are non clan people fighting ... this is NOT a PVP game, it IS a RPG with pvp potentials ... if a player is non clan they should not be FORCED INTO PVP!!!
That being said, this post is not needed for discussion...
Whilst I suppose that it would be better to let people to attack more people and the 3 levels is kinda sloppy these days, what's the alternative?
Being attacked by a swarm of people whilst outside clan is bad enough, why let them do it also when they're 1k levels higher?
People who want to PvP should just join clans.
Ariminum
First FT Lumberjack World Champion
Added ideas: More friends list space
Other ideas: New clan rank: Mayor, The team page
Co-creator of the Ember Islands clan map with KalenFirst
- LostKnight
- Posts: 6421
- Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2017 8:02 pm
- Location: Rockhiem nord i Steinhus nær Kedington
Re: Lvls difference in pvp protect
Actually it's not 3±, it is:
You can attack someone 3 levels lower than you.
You can attack ANYONE higher then you.
LK was lvl ±100 and GOLGREN(2K+) was TANKING for me in the mine under Silverwood.
All of a sudden I see:
You can attack someone 3 levels lower than you.
You can attack ANYONE higher then you.
LK was lvl ±100 and GOLGREN(2K+) was TANKING for me in the mine under Silverwood.
All of a sudden I see:
Now at that time GOL could have "EATEN" LK but he didn't, so he cant say:KNIGHT ATTACKING GOL IT TICKLES
GOLGREN EAT KNIGHT ONCE
I'll fight for what I think is right!
Re: Lvls difference in pvp protect
Reminds me of all the times I leveled with cotne and then fire skilled him.LostKnight wrote: ↑Sun May 19, 2024 6:29 pm LK was lvl ±100 and GOLGREN(2K+) was TANKING for me in the mine under Silverwood.
All of a sudden I see:Now at that time GOL could have "EATEN" LK but he didn't, so he cant say:KNIGHT ATTACKING GOL IT TICKLES
GOLGREN EAT KNIGHT ONCE
He didn't ever decide to eat me.
Ariminum
First FT Lumberjack World Champion
Added ideas: More friends list space
Other ideas: New clan rank: Mayor, The team page
Co-creator of the Ember Islands clan map with KalenFirst