Page 1 of 1

clarification fun war,war for fun

Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2015 3:26 am
by rearrow
i introduced the term 'fun war,' war for fun' about a year ago. since then it has been used a lot but meanings seem to differ.
let me explain what it originaly was.

At the time we were at war with DR. we also had been at war with nWo and lost losts or gear and buildings.
that had bern resolved and we wre friends again but tired f loosibg buildibgs and gear.
we were in a phase of rebuilding but got a bit bored. DR and raw were warring (everyone was warring DR) but had huge respect for eachother. neither would run, log or use tricks.
mostky we would attack as close to the same lvl as possible.

lasttry2 would stand w DOOM and they would shoot until one was dead. i do the same wuth blue aro or other dr archer. swordsman would go at swordsman.
if sword against archer archer would stand still.
no surprise attacks. opponents were first challenged , insulted then attack proceded.

often place was agreed beforehand. if two oponents met elsewhere they decided on the spot if they would fight or grind together.
if lvls were very unequal the stronger one would try to give the weaker a chance. i vividly remember sometimes taking doom down to vry low hp before he would attack back. so i could kill him once in a while (which i then boasted about of course)

of course all gear was returned anf no buildings attacked ever.

this was the meaning of a 'fun war' in its original meaning. it was more like a series of duels to the death.

Re: clarification fun war,war for fun

Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2015 1:16 pm
by Insider
Lol liked its clarification by AD
But ur is much better ;)

Re: clarification fun war,war for fun

Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2015 2:06 pm
by rearrow
now as for royalties .... :()

Re: clarification fun war,war for fun

Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2015 9:16 pm
by Asmodeous
Insiders/Inferno! wrote:Lol liked its clarification by AD
But ur is much better ;)
No need ;) since it was never said. Whole thread on it too.