Clan service and the fate of active and inactive clans

Clans are a big part of the game. Please post clan-related subjects here!

Moderator: Game Administrators

Barkley
Posts: 91
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2018 11:12 pm
Location: Slovenia

Re: Clan service and the fate of active and inactive clans

Post by Barkley » Thu Oct 17, 2019 3:13 pm

LostKnight wrote:
Thu Oct 17, 2019 3:07 pm
Barkley wrote:
Thu Oct 17, 2019 2:55 pm
The "siege" you mention will be in game soon. It was already announced
Oh I missed that ... got a link?
viewtopic.php?p=118484#p118484
People shold learn wars bring nothing. When you win others cry when they win you die. Good people are the ones who help each other
Be good,be nice,be smart and never lie or you will lie to yourself!
hungry_wolf
Posts: 640
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2016 10:25 am
Location: Italy

Re: Clan service and the fate of active and inactive clans

Post by hungry_wolf » Thu Oct 17, 2019 3:30 pm

yes I read it, is good but less funny :D :D
Sword dislike sieging
Dwarf dislike mining
Archer dislike crafting
Ogre dislike fishing
Mage dislike magic
User avatar
LostKnight
Posts: 5013
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2017 8:02 pm
Location: Rockheim nord i Steinheim nær Kedington

Re: Clan service and the fate of active and inactive clans

Post by LostKnight » Thu Oct 17, 2019 4:27 pm

Barkley wrote:
Thu Oct 17, 2019 3:13 pm
LostKnight wrote:
Thu Oct 17, 2019 3:07 pm
Barkley wrote:
Thu Oct 17, 2019 2:55 pm
The "siege" you mention will be in game soon. It was already announced
Oh I missed that ... got a link?
viewtopic.php?p=118484#p118484
But that is not a "siege" and not what hungry_wolf was talking about. That's just decaying buildings, and of course I knew that.

hungry_wolf's idea is to have a [CLAN] that is not a player clan, but one run by the "system" (server) on random maps at random times to siege buildings. Active clans would attack the "[Sys] Siege" clan and protect their buildings.

Inactive clans would have buildings damaged and not repaired, and if other clans on the map did not attack and kill the "[Sys] Siege1 to [Sys] Siege10" (as an example) characters they might just do a LOT of damage or kill an "inactive" clan over time.

Let me add to hungry_wolf's idea: they once they start to attack a clan, they attack all of that clans buildings 24/7/365 or until they are killed. Finished killing off a clan or being killed themselves and the random cycle starts again. :twisted:

I actually quite like that idea:
Stay tuned, different clan map, different clan attacked, different [Sys]clan time!
The sun will never set if you keep walking towards it. - my son
User avatar
Storms7
Posts: 359
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 4:38 am

Re: Clan service and the fate of active and inactive clans

Post by Storms7 » Thu Oct 17, 2019 4:37 pm

hungry_wolf wrote:
Thu Oct 17, 2019 2:24 pm
I m not involved in clans anymore, but I don't like the idea of inactive clans. if no active clan attacks to check clan survey, I like the idea could exist a 'system clan' that siege randomly, if a clan is really inactive, would be damaged or destroyed. this would wake up some that think to own pieces of the game :twisted:
moreover, to compensate disturb of attack, who defeat attackers could get a reward. maybe could make game more interesting..
+1
Ryaca_1:ghost:
Barkley
Posts: 91
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2018 11:12 pm
Location: Slovenia

Re: Clan service and the fate of active and inactive clans

Post by Barkley » Thu Oct 17, 2019 5:11 pm

LostKnight wrote:
Thu Oct 17, 2019 4:27 pm
Barkley wrote:
Thu Oct 17, 2019 3:13 pm
LostKnight wrote:
Thu Oct 17, 2019 3:07 pm

Oh I missed that ... got a link?
viewtopic.php?p=118484#p118484
But that is not a "siege" and not what hungry_wolf was talking about. That's just decaying buildings, and of course I knew that.

hungry_wolf's idea is to have a [CLAN] that is not a player clan, but one run by the "system" (server) on random maps at random times to siege buildings. Active clans would attack the "[Sys] Siege" clan and protect their buildings.

Inactive clans would have buildings damaged and not repaired, and if other clans on the map did not attack and kill the "[Sys] Siege1 to [Sys] Siege10" (as an example) characters they might just do a LOT of damage or kill an "inactive" clan over time.

Let me add to hungry_wolf's idea: they once they start to attack a clan, they attack all of that clans buildings 24/7/365 or until they are killed. Finished killing off a clan or being killed themselves and the random cycle starts again. :twisted:

I actually quite like that idea:
Stay tuned, different clan map, different clan attacked, different [Sys]clan time!
So I misunderstood it. But it is basecly that it damages buildings like what was announced...
People shold learn wars bring nothing. When you win others cry when they win you die. Good people are the ones who help each other
Be good,be nice,be smart and never lie or you will lie to yourself!
User avatar
LostKnight
Posts: 5013
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2017 8:02 pm
Location: Rockheim nord i Steinheim nær Kedington

Re: Clan service and the fate of active and inactive clans

Post by LostKnight » Thu Oct 17, 2019 5:40 pm

Barkley wrote:
Thu Oct 17, 2019 5:11 pm
So I misunderstood it. But it is basecly that it damages buildings like what was announced...
It happens. No harm, no foul. :)
The sun will never set if you keep walking towards it. - my son
User avatar
Storms7
Posts: 359
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 4:38 am

Re: Clan service and the fate of active and inactive clans

Post by Storms7 » Thu Oct 17, 2019 7:10 pm

SellSword wrote:
Thu Oct 17, 2019 2:54 am
I would say yes. Clan members are responsible for their own actions and shouldn't be allowed to hide with an argument of "I didn't place it here." How easy would it be to have some low-level alt place spam and others to work on it? Goes for the initial building as well as repairing.
That's the way I see it also.
Ryaca_1:ghost:
User avatar
coolguy
Posts: 114
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2015 3:28 pm
Location: Bucharest, Romania

Re: Clan service and the fate of active and inactive clans

Post by coolguy » Thu Oct 17, 2019 7:15 pm

LostKnight wrote:
Thu Oct 17, 2019 4:27 pm
Barkley wrote:
Thu Oct 17, 2019 3:13 pm
LostKnight wrote:
Thu Oct 17, 2019 3:07 pm

Oh I missed that ... got a link?
viewtopic.php?p=118484#p118484
But that is not a "siege" and not what hungry_wolf was talking about. That's just decaying buildings, and of course I knew that.

hungry_wolf's idea is to have a [CLAN] that is not a player clan, but one run by the "system" (server) on random maps at random times to siege buildings. Active clans would attack the "[Sys] Siege" clan and protect their buildings.

Inactive clans would have buildings damaged and not repaired, and if other clans on the map did not attack and kill the "[Sys] Siege1 to [Sys] Siege10" (as an example) characters they might just do a LOT of damage or kill an "inactive" clan over time.

Let me add to hungry_wolf's idea: they once they start to attack a clan, they attack all of that clans buildings 24/7/365 or until they are killed. Finished killing off a clan or being killed themselves and the random cycle starts again. :twisted:

I actually quite like that idea:
Stay tuned, different clan map, different clan attacked, different [Sys]clan time!
Good idea, +1 Makes clan more noticeable and more active.
Swordsman : coolguy - Archer : coolarcher - Mage: coolguy1

Languages Spoken : English - Arabic (عربي) - Romanian (Romana)

Loyalty is the big title of a successful team.
Post Reply