Forgotten Tales MMORPG 5.2.4

stay tuned

Moderator: Game Administrators

User avatar
Shotu
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 5:50 pm

Re: Forgotten Tales MMORPG 5.2.4

Post by Shotu » Fri Aug 12, 2016 9:58 am

We could make a list maybe. ;)
User-
1shotu (main)
Tap11 (mage)
User avatar
Cleopatra
Posts: 810
Joined: Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:00 am
Location: USA

Re: Forgotten Tales MMORPG 5.2.4

Post by Cleopatra » Fri Aug 12, 2016 11:50 am

The new purchasable pets will probably not be nearly as profitable unless you're at least 1 k+
If ur at 770lv the Golden Dragon is still a really good pets and now you have the option of getting two of them. 2 is always better than one :-/. Of course I wouldn't have killed both pets and then purchase I would only kill the lowest pet. And I already said a purchase list on pets would be very useful on the Forum.
Languages Spoken: English
Facebook name: Cleopatra Ft
I'm a veteran GM of almost 2 years
Dwarf = Worf, Soldier = Captn Kirk, Archer = Tuvok, Ogre = Quark, Mage = Almighty Q
If you can't play honestly then plz honestly don't play!
The Houstaaja
Posts: 268
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 4:37 pm
Location: Finland, Jyväskylä

Re: Forgotten Tales MMORPG 5.2.4

Post by The Houstaaja » Fri Aug 12, 2016 11:55 am

Aaaand greediness strikes again, why am i not supriced?
THE DEVIL (Dwarf) (371).
The Ogre (150). (raw).
The Magic (106).
The Archer (130).
SPECTER (Swordman) (155).
SHOPKEEPER (10) storage account.
Game Translator.
Languages spoken: Finnish, English.
User avatar
aang
Posts: 49
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2015 12:23 am

Re: Forgotten Tales MMORPG 5.2.4

Post by aang » Fri Aug 12, 2016 4:11 pm

Cleopatra wrote:The new purchasable pets will probably not be nearly as profitable unless you're at least 1 k+
If ur at 770lv the Golden Dragon is still a really good pets and now you have the option of getting two of them. 2 is always better than one :-/. Of course I wouldn't have killed both pets and then purchase I would only kill the lowest pet. And I already said a purchase list on pets would be very useful on the Forum.
Players 500lvl have a dino pet, dino better. Next pet worm on 900+lvl, yes?
User avatar
aang
Posts: 49
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2015 12:23 am

Re: Forgotten Tales MMORPG 5.2.4

Post by aang » Fri Aug 12, 2016 4:13 pm

Really i want see pets/lvls list , i dont want buy what i cant see :evil:
User avatar
compbatant
Site Admin
Posts: 1487
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 12:00 am
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Contact:

Re: Forgotten Tales MMORPG 5.2.4

Post by compbatant » Fri Aug 12, 2016 4:52 pm

Formula is simple. You get the pet with level equals half of your level. So just check monsters list.
User avatar
Blaze
Posts: 123
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2015 6:02 am
Location: Tennessee

Re: Forgotten Tales MMORPG 5.2.4

Post by Blaze » Fri Aug 12, 2016 4:55 pm

Aangs right. I'm not happy with my purchase either. This isn't a very good set up. I wanted blue devils but got dinos. Now I want a refund.
BLAZE KING Lv 1140 TRIO
User avatar
aang
Posts: 49
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2015 12:23 am

Re: Forgotten Tales MMORPG 5.2.4

Post by aang » Fri Aug 12, 2016 5:14 pm

compbatant wrote:Formula is simple. You get the pet with level equals half of your level. So just check monsters list.
Dragon is 360 lvl, im 780 not simpe
And i want see what i buy, and not want see formula. I give money for it, pets list it simpe, 1 hours of work. And all happy
User avatar
Shotu
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 5:50 pm

Re: Forgotten Tales MMORPG 5.2.4

Post by Shotu » Fri Aug 12, 2016 5:38 pm

Lvl 706-819 is Golden dragon. Dont buy pets then guys lol.
820 is worm
User-
1shotu (main)
Tap11 (mage)
User avatar
Blaze
Posts: 123
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2015 6:02 am
Location: Tennessee

Re: Forgotten Tales MMORPG 5.2.4

Post by Blaze » Fri Aug 12, 2016 5:55 pm

compbatant wrote:Formula is simple. You get the pet with level equals half of your level. So just check monsters list.
I looked on monster list. There are better monsters that would be available to a lower lv than I am. For instance a blinking mage is better than a dino
BLAZE KING Lv 1140 TRIO
Post Reply