Lvls difference in pvp protect

[cotne7]

I think its 3 or 4 lvls difference.i mean:if player is 3 or 4 lvls lower then you,you cant attack him/her becouse of enemy is too weak.this rule was from the beggining of game and never changed becouse no too high lvls in game.but now there are alot high lvls in game.i think 5k player should be able to attack 4k player if they are unclanned.becouse there are many chances 4k player can win to 5k player.please balance those caps in pvp lvls.am i right what do you guys think?

[cotne7]

800 lvl should be able to attack 750 and so on...

[Ayoub]

Cotne the killer xD .
Yes i like the idea especially vs mages ( cus low lvls mage can win and survive against higher lvls )
they should make it not 3 or 4 lvls but i think 5% or 10% from his lvl .
Exemple :
If u are 10k u able to atk 9k player (10% of ur lvl)

[Rothost]

I think its 3 or 4 lvls difference.i mean:if player is 3 or 4 lvls lower then you,you cant attack him/her becouse of enemy is too weak.this rule was from the beggining of game and never changed becouse no too high lvls in game.but now there are alot high lvls in game.i think 5k player should be able to attack 4k player if they are unclanned.becouse there are many chances 4k player can win to 5k player.please balance those caps in pvp lvls.am i right what do you guys think?

NON CLAN is 3 ± ... if you are in a clan there is no limit ... so why are non clan people fighting ... this is NOT a PVP game, it IS a RPG with pvp potentials ... if a player is non clan they should not be FORCED INTO PVP!!!

That being said, this post is not needed for discussion...

[Aogon]

Nothing is preventing the lower level players from attacking higher levels. The intent is to reduce "bullying" by higher levels of lower levels. At the higher levels, I'd have to agree that more than 3 levels could be easily allowed, but I (personally) don't see the point in opening more non-clanned players up to potential abuse from higher level players.

[SK1976]

it relies on people's attitudes

[LostKnight]

NON CLAN is 3 ± ... if you are in a clan there is no limit ... so why are non clan people fighting ... this is NOT a PVP game, it IS a RPG with pvp potentials ... if a player is non clan they should not be FORCED INTO PVP!!!

That being said, this post is not needed for discussion...

Totally agree with this.

[Barkley]

NON CLAN is 3 ± ... if you are in a clan there is no limit ... so why are non clan people fighting ... this is NOT a PVP game, it IS a RPG with pvp potentials ... if a player is non clan they should not be FORCED INTO PVP!!!

That being said, this post is not needed for discussion...

I think so too.
Whilst I suppose that it would be better to let people to attack more people and the 3 levels is kinda sloppy these days, what's the alternative?
Being attacked by a swarm of people whilst outside clan is bad enough, why let them do it also when they're 1k levels higher?

People who want to PvP should just join clans.

[LostKnight]

Actually it's not 3±, it is:
You can attack someone 3 levels lower than you.
You can attack ANYONE higher then you.

LK was lvl ±100 and GOLGREN(2K+) was TANKING for me in the mine under Silverwood.
All of a sudden I see:

KNIGHT ATTACKING GOL IT TICKLES

Now at that time GOL could have "EATEN" LK but he didn't, so he cant say:

GOLGREN EAT KNIGHT ONCE

[Barkley]

LK was lvl ±100 and GOLGREN(2K+) was TANKING for me in the mine under Silverwood.
All of a sudden I see:

KNIGHT ATTACKING GOL IT TICKLES

Now at that time GOL could have "EATEN" LK but he didn't, so he cant say:

GOLGREN EAT KNIGHT ONCE

Reminds me of all the times I leveled with cotne and then fire skilled him.
He didn't ever decide to eat me.