Nasty attack

[SK1976]

After being killed many times
I quit the clan
And this time, the dwarf player made a very bad behavior
I can understand that he can't beat the archer because neither can I

But he stunned me after he attracted the archer

Is this okay?
Edited (Akkilles): This is not ok and by the look of it, this Dwarf is attempting a what so called "spawn killing". I will warned this player to stop this behavior and if he does it again. He'll risk a punishment.

I thought after leaving the clan
Will not be attacked for no reason
Can such players be punished?

if they only killing or hunting you many times in a row he can be punished, but we need screen in gm inbox

[SK1976]

a lil help maybe can be if you take a look into your last atkers list in "i",
forgive that player, than you not anylonger RED for him, and maybe he cant see you as fast as before

Try it !

[dustintheash]

a lil help maybe can be if you take a look into your last atkers list in "i",
forgive that player, than you not anylonger RED for him, and maybe he cant see you as fast as before

Try it !

I know that
thank you

[LostKnight]

a lil help maybe can be if you take a look into your last atkers list in "i",
forgive that player, than you not anylonger RED for him, and maybe he cant see you as fast as before

Try it !

Say what!

Example:
- Bob attacks Sam.
- Sam looks in his (i) tab and sees: You have been attacked by Bob
- After that every time time Sam sees Bob his name is red.
- - Unless he "Forgives him"

Are you saying that because Bob attacked Sam, Bob also sees Sam in red.

1. Sam was not the attacker!
1a. Why would his name be red
2. Even if Sam fights back, he is defending himself, not attacking.
3. Is Sam's name red to Bob if he did NOT FIGHT back but simply logged off?

It is my understanding that people that attack ME, I see in red, they do not see my name in red. And for me that's a good thing, it means I need to be cautious around them as I do not PvP.

If my attackers see my name in red there is something worng with the colouring of the "attacker names" in the game.

____
Edited: 12:38

[justj99]

Only the initial attacker's name will be red. It still works the same. Basically, only people in your attacker list can have red names. They may be other colors if an outlaw or friend, etc.

[Leone]

The /forgive feature is discussed at length in this thread, with clarification:

viewtopic.php?f=6&t=18386&p=133314&hili ... or#p133329

[LostKnight]

The /forgive feature is discussed at length in this thread, with clarification:

viewtopic.php?f=6&t=18386&p=133314&hili ... or#p133329

Exactly as I thought it should be.

SK seemed to be saying something different, unless it was lost in translation.

[SK1976]

sure...u all r right, but mostely players fighting back too, and that was only my idea.

SRy for that idea

[dustintheash]

sure...u all r right, but mostely players fighting back too, and that was only my idea.

SRy for that idea

When I was still in the clan
There was even an LV20 mage who attacked me when I delivered the task
That's next to the bank
I fought back
I can kill him but I don't
I also asked why he attacked me
Haha
Is so funny

[LostKnight]

sure...u all r right, but mostely players fighting back too, and that was only my idea.

SRy for that idea

No please ... it got a misunderstanding cleared up.
Good to know that "defending" does not make your name red for the attacker.
But I agree, "forgiving" an attacker does remove the red name