The rules you reported are perfectly correct.
They must be read carefully because there is not a single incorrect word.
Let me explain better:
. Anything that happens on Facebook is subject to administrative and/or criminal prosecution.
Consequently, after a royal ruling it is right that it be extended to other areas as well.
(This is what he says in fact).
. The rule explains well that when you are in the game and you do not respect each other, it is right to take action. And in these cases it is absolutely not automatic that this will have repercussions on Facebook.
That is, the road is one-way and does not function in both directions.
I'm not aware of any insults in the game.
The insults took place on Facebook, which has already been used by the people in question before. Without any problems (so there is not even any stalking abuse). But be careful, even if there were, there are real laws to protect yourself and not FT.
Any problem in real or facebook does not affect FT.
What happens in FT does not have repercussions in real or Facebook.
They are two different realities and are treated as such.
What happens in real life or on Facebook is already protected by real-world law. And if anyone has any problems, contact their lawyer. It will be the real judge who will take measures. (These measures are not up to us and we cannot imagine that they can be reflected on FT. All the more so since to date no real judge of a real court has ever expressed himself on any of this matter.
So it seems that in this case there were no insults in the FT game but only on Facebook. And this caused maschika's account to be deleted. And that's not correct.
(If the in-game insults occurred after the 8000 account deletion, then they do not count towards the deletion of the same account.)
(finally: if there were insults in FT, and only afterwards were insults also made on Facebook and subsequently the account was deleted: in this case: It would be useful to have a roadmap on which and how many levels of reporting, penalties and sanctions should be applied. But in this case it seems that a single decision was taken by a single person without any consultation between GMs or others. In short, for now it seems to be simply a super abuse dictated by From so much arrogance.
Since I don't want to end everything I've written with the last word of the last paragraph then I simply say goodbye to you all and feel very happy to know that a person like akkilles exists . Regardless of the outcome of the investigation into this case, I'm glad Akkilles exists.
