Forgotten Tales

Posted: **Sat Jun 16, 2018 2:50 am**

Player A is a high level player that griefs others on a regular basis. This player unclans when level grinding to avoid any retribution from higher level clanned enemies. Meanwhile, other lower level players fed up with player A's annoying tactics decide to gather a group to give player A a taste of their own medicine.

In the games current setup player A can be freely attacked by lower levels as it should be

If this suggestion were to be implemented It would mean player A would be able to grief others and never have to taste their own medicine as they would be able to unclan and turn pvp off and grind away not having to face any repercussions of their previous actions.

This would be very unfair and abuse on my opinion

That Is why this suggestion is not a good idea.

Posted: **Sat Jun 16, 2018 4:39 am**

Yep that's why i said i would support only if abuse by players would be prevented in some way

Posted: **Sat Jun 16, 2018 5:32 am**

Isnt that what he can already do by buying pvp protection?

Btw im staying out of this subject since im unsure.
I dont pvp much but it has its place. Especialy in clanplay.
My two suggestions would be no dropping items at a certain leveldifference and a second non_pvp server in the future (since lvl buying would be low here i would support a monthly fee or some other way to earn its due)

Posted: **Sat Jun 16, 2018 6:14 am**

death911 wrote: Fri Jun 15, 2018 3:09 pm
Nahgus wrote: Fri Jun 15, 2018 1:24 pm This is a pvp game

I vote no
Its just like saying "Each and every player is bound to do PVP to play the game"
Does any NPC say that "U are gonna have to do pvp compulsorily to stay in the game!"? Do any quests require that the player must have done PVP in order to take the Quest?
So how is it a PVP game? So no its not a PVP game..
Yes PVP is a part of the game but that's not essential to play the game!! Just as Special skins are there in game but are absolutely not essential to play the game.

So any player doesn't want PVP is free to buy PVP protection and stay out of the PVP.

My only point is PVP protection buy should be a one time thing or a one yearly thing and affordable so that anyone can buy and enjoy his own game..

And yes rearrow is right in some countries even buying an item which cost €1 ie equivalent to a day wages.
pls don't mock them by giving such expressions in the post.

I M KNOWING THE OFFLINE-VERSION OF FT ! THAT WAS THE 1ST GAME OF FT ! ITS REALY NOT A PVP-GAME ! THESE FUNKTION WAS ONLY INTEGRATED FOR PEOPLES WHO WANNA HAVE FUN WITH PVP ! AND...(to make money too) !

Posted: **Sat Jun 16, 2018 7:11 am**

@rearrow
Yup Buying PVP protection every week is ridiculous. Make it a one time thing or an yearly thing. that's what i have suggested earlier

Posted: **Sat Jun 16, 2018 7:53 am**

not that I'm particularly worried or anything, but why do you keep saying that it's ridiculous? What I mean is - what standard are you judging it by, or to what are you comparing it that you're concluding that weekly PvP protection is ridiculous? Is it too much money for permanent protection? is it the idea that it's easy to abuse? etc...

Posted: **Sat Jun 16, 2018 8:11 am**

It's buying every week than bothers me. 1€ per week means 52€ per year. i would rather spend 52€ on buying lvls or pets instead or even a house. Buying pvp protection doesn't seem worth it to me at least.

Posted: **Sat Jun 16, 2018 8:14 am**

ok, thanks for clarifying

- we don't have to agree on it's value or whatever of course, I was just genuinely curious about why specifically you felt it needs changed

Posted: **Sat Jun 16, 2018 12:11 pm**

i think most players knowing who is a pvp player and who is not !

Posted: **Sat Jun 16, 2018 7:34 pm**

My suggestion is keep pvp only clan maps, kinda like RuneScape 2 to pvp you go wilderness or arena, or castle wars. Questing and grinding should be free of pvp period.

Forgotten Tales

To PvP or Not to PvP ...

Re: To PvP or Not to PvP ...

Re: To PvP or Not to PvP ...

Re: To PvP or Not to PvP ...

Re: To PvP or Not to PvP ...

Re: To PvP or Not to PvP ...

Re: To PvP or Not to PvP ...

Re: To PvP or Not to PvP ...

Re: To PvP or Not to PvP ...

Re: To PvP or Not to PvP ...

Re: To PvP or Not to PvP ...