New Formula For Players Over Level 3377
Moderator: Game Administrators
- Leone
- Posts: 5192
- Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 12:00 am
- Location: Ashdown Village
Re: New Formula For Players Over Level 3377
You've a good memory my mate about levels.
That's a long time ago. Good times though.
That's a long time ago. Good times though.
- proto_nuke
- Posts: 332
- Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2019 4:30 am
- Location: Hell
Re: New Formula For Players Over Level 3377
That was a memory I'll never forget. You took me under your wing and gave me advice about the game.
Ryaca_1
- SellSword
- Posts: 4037
- Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2017 11:16 pm
- Location: Ardesia
Re: New Formula For Players Over Level 3377
And he still does!proto_nuke wrote: Sun Sep 01, 2019 2:28 am That was a memory I'll never forget. You took me under your wing and gave me advice about the game.
Good forum historian too!

Old soldiers never die, they just fade away.
- LostKnight
- Posts: 6445
- Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2017 8:02 pm
- Location: Rockhiem nord i Steinhus nær Kedington
Re: New Formula For Players Over Level 3377
ALL HAIL LEONE: Forum Historian!
I'll fight for what I think is right!
-
- Posts: 540
- Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2019 10:15 am
Re: New Formula For Players Over Level 3377
Me parece bien la fórmula para reducir los lvl.
Pero mis cuentas me fallan.
Como un jugador 7200 lvl que nunca compro lvl ha podido quedar en lvl 4990...
Son 2200 lvl que bajaron....
Si se supone que que 7200-3377= son 3823 lvl
3823 lvl X 650k exp de menos por lvl = son 2,3 B de exp
Quitarle a un lvl 7200 2,3B de exp , el resultado es lvl 4990???? En serio?
Según veo muchos de clan Waar, Raw, etc etc no han bajado ni un solo lvl. Esto es creíble ?
Veo esta medida MUY injusta, y como siempre a favor del bando americano. Una medida más para darle poder al que no lo tenía ,
No sabía que al iniciar un juego podías cambiar las reglas a tu antojo, la gente hasta dinero real y ustedes hacen que ese gasto no valga nada modificando las reglas una y otra vez. Esto tiene un nombre, se llama estafa.
Pero mis cuentas me fallan.
Como un jugador 7200 lvl que nunca compro lvl ha podido quedar en lvl 4990...
Son 2200 lvl que bajaron....
Si se supone que que 7200-3377= son 3823 lvl
3823 lvl X 650k exp de menos por lvl = son 2,3 B de exp
Quitarle a un lvl 7200 2,3B de exp , el resultado es lvl 4990???? En serio?
Según veo muchos de clan Waar, Raw, etc etc no han bajado ni un solo lvl. Esto es creíble ?
Veo esta medida MUY injusta, y como siempre a favor del bando americano. Una medida más para darle poder al que no lo tenía ,
No sabía que al iniciar un juego podías cambiar las reglas a tu antojo, la gente hasta dinero real y ustedes hacen que ese gasto no valga nada modificando las reglas una y otra vez. Esto tiene un nombre, se llama estafa.
- proto_nuke
- Posts: 332
- Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2019 4:30 am
- Location: Hell
Re: New Formula For Players Over Level 3377
Those whose levels didn't change had bought most of their levels. I am one of those. My level is still 5211.
I can assure you or anyone else that there is no favoritism going on here for anyone.
Let me remind you that the GM team would not benifit at all from showing favoritism. The idea that the GM's want to save any clan map or help any side in the war really is not feasible.
I can assure you or anyone else that there is no favoritism going on here for anyone.
Let me remind you that the GM team would not benifit at all from showing favoritism. The idea that the GM's want to save any clan map or help any side in the war really is not feasible.
Ryaca_1
- madmaniacal1
- Posts: 1685
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2016 12:29 am
Re: New Formula For Players Over Level 3377
Ummm... I see that El Menda has his math slightly wrong, so I will try to explain this simply.
The exp needed to gain a level increases by 650k every level. That is understood. That means 650k for the first, 650k×2 for the second, 650k×3 for the third, etc. That adds up to far more than 2.3b when the math is done.
I hope this helps to explain the number of levels "balanced".
The exp needed to gain a level increases by 650k every level. That is understood. That means 650k for the first, 650k×2 for the second, 650k×3 for the third, etc. That adds up to far more than 2.3b when the math is done.
I hope this helps to explain the number of levels "balanced".
Omnes Autem Uri
-
- Posts: 540
- Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2019 10:15 am
Re: New Formula For Players Over Level 3377
Permíteme que lo duda.... Llegó jugando casi un año, y desde que entre en el mundo del clan.. todo lo veo oscuro y sin salida por ser españolproto_nuke wrote: Sun Sep 01, 2019 1:31 pm Those whose levels didn't change had bought most of their levels. I am one of those. My level is still 5211.
I can assure you or anyone else that there is no favoritism going on here for anyone.
Let me remind you that the GM team would not benifit at all from showing favoritism. The idea that the GM's want to save any clan map or help any side in the war really is not feasible.
-
- Posts: 540
- Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2019 10:15 am
Re: New Formula For Players Over Level 3377
Ahora sí lo entendí.madmaniacal1 wrote: Sun Sep 01, 2019 4:18 pm Ummm... I see that El Menda has his math slightly wrong, so I will try to explain this simply.
The exp needed to gain a level increases by 650k every level. That is understood. That means 650k for the first, 650k×2 for the second, 650k×3 for the third, etc. That adds up to far more than 2.3b when the math is done.
I hope this helps to explain the number of levels "balanced".
Es 650k de forma exponencial, X2 para lvl 2
X3 para lvl 4
X4 para lvl 5
Ok ok ok. Ahora sí lo entiendo. Gracias
- DwarfTank
- Posts: 922
- Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2015 12:48 am
- Location: America (United States
- Contact:
Re: New Formula For Players Over Level 3377
I'm BAAAAAAAAAAAAAACK!!!
et omnes adolebitque
et omnes adolebitque
DwarfTank-lvl2324(Legendary Player)
ShadowHood-lvl2668(Black Dragon Skin)
-_They tell me that "I am only mortal and no one important" to which I simply reply "prove it"_-
ShadowHood-lvl2668(Black Dragon Skin)
-_They tell me that "I am only mortal and no one important" to which I simply reply "prove it"_-