'Settling a Disagreeance on Accusations of Spam Building

[quickshot3]

So I just week jail on my mage.

I put 2 castle and 1 tower between 2 clans that currently in war. and I was helping one of the clans.

I was on for 1 hour building them with 2 other members. So was 3 of us.

1 castle for finished and was attacking with arrows.

The other castle and tower was green but couldn't finish them because the enemy tower got auto on me. (Not easy build when a 2850 tower attacking u)

Anyways. the unfinished castle and tower (Wich is green HP) gets destroyed.

I try lvl and build the other castle but was too many so I sold it and gave up.


I have screenshot of the buildings I was working on them and they where all above red hp they where green.

The real plan was. the enemy clan was asleep and logged where I put my buildings. as a war strategy I was gonna get that building Lvl 50 . because most of the players had catapults so it would easy destroy them. bud things got out of plan when the enemy clan auto me

Also a GM told me one of the reasons I'm in jail and it's spam was because I built on a clan map where I had no allies.


So you need allies to be able legally build a clan? otherwise u be in jail?

that is what I been told i look forum and I don't find this rule.

Basically. I'm in jail for 1 week for litterly nothing. from what I see and some other ones I asked.

They recommended me upload this post because it is unfair.

[NightBaby]

I was there helping build, why not jail me too? Like I said before, these accusations seem STUPID. How can a GM have the authority to tell a player what their intentions were? I just completely disagreed with the judgement in this case. Love how you need a GM's permission to build without allies btw

[MadMikael]

Fact: when players face punishment, most lie to get out of it.
I'm not accusing here.
I'm just pointing out that there is no evidence to suggest you were working with one clan or the other.
As for alliances, they are an undisputable way to say "we're on the same team".
As always, when you disagree with a GM decision, you can appeal to an admin if you like.
But as for what happened, I see nothing that refutes said decision.

[DwarfTank]

I was there helping build, why not jail me too? Like I said before, these accusations seem STUPID. How can a GM have the authority to tell a player what their intentions were? I just completely disagreed with the judgement in this case. Love how you need a GM's permission to build without allies btw

Yeah I know right.

You need alliance with other clan(s) now to build a base?

REALLY!?

Doesn't such hinder one in playing the game, such hindrance infringes on one's ability to play and enjoy the game. Does it not? I do believe it does.

What if a player wants a base but doesn't want to be allied, allying is a choice, right? It always was according to my understanding.....


This whole situation is trash.

[NightBaby]

Agree, DT. This is what I woke up to this morning

[DwarfTank]

I've seen all the screenshots of this case, I see no reason for jailing, fact: Being forced to ally with a clan to have/build a base is blatantly absurd.

[MadMikael]

You're absolutely right.
Let's just scrap the rule and go back to the way it was.
Because that worked.

How would you describe a "spam clan"?
Enlighten me.
You show up in an unknown situation, and you have to decide.
How would you describe it?
Oh, I'm not talking the easy ones that are "black and white"..
I'm talking grey area here.

We've all put some opinions in when this rule was being formed.
Now it's there - but that doesn't mean it can't change.

If you really have a better method, please share.

[Leone]

I've seen all the screenshots of this case, I see no reason for jailing, fact: Being forced to ally with a clan to have/build a base is blatantly absurd.

I'm not entirely sure, but I would guess this system has been put in place as the system was previously being abused. Please correct me if I'm wrong though:)

[quickshot3]

Fact: when players face punishment, most lie to get out of it.
I'm not accusing here.
I'm just pointing out that there is no evidence to suggest you were working with one clan or the other.
As for alliances, they are an undisputable way to say "we're on the same team".
As always, when you disagree with a GM decision, you can appeal to an admin if you like.
But as for what happened, I see nothing that refutes said decision.

I have no reason to lie. I have screenshots of the buildings hp. 1 castle was complete. 1 tower and 1 castle was green hp. I only had those 3 buildings. I couldn't finish those 2 was because the enemy clan auto me I had no way. plan was make em high enough to kill their cats when they wake up as I said.

In the screenshots I also have timestamp as it requires.

You a GM you could go check it out.

The GM said I put 9 buildings. I had 3 buildings. it must have said 9 buildings because I put a castle and sold several times because wanted it on right location with the range of it etc.

[haha2u]

When there is clear proof of you building them it seems pretty crazy to call it spam. Technically it was in the area of my contested base in which I agreed for you to build so what is the problem? I can understand placing buildings and not doing anything but that was not the case here. you took the time to mine and upgrade them.